There are a number of legacy systems being used in different industries. These range from government entities to the financial sector, healthcare, transportation, manufacturing, and more. Many systems adopted in these industries were developed in the late 20th century and, therefore, face inherent limitations. The monolithic architectures and tightly coupled components they adopt are the prime reason for this.
But that's not the end of it, though. Previous-century development aside, some systems built using relatively more recent technologies also present several legacy issues. This is because of the rigid, stateful sessions and the management nature of these platforms.
As a result, the modern "scalable architecture" has come to light. For example, microservices, based on a number of technologies, adopt a great way to solve this issue. It uses:
The key principle that makes the architecture "scalable" is how it decomposes monolithic applications into smaller, independent services. Each of these services can be independently developed, deployed, and scaled; be it individually or simultaneously. This, in turn, improves resilience and agility.
This article will dive into scalable architectures, discussing how they can promote legacy system transformation for overall system maintainability.
IBM IMS, COBOL, JSP Servlets, WebSphere, and other technologies often lead to performance bottlenecks. This is primarily because of the monolithic architecture they adopt, as well as the non-distributed design. Each process is analyzed and performed in a single flow instead of being distributed, hence leading to bottlenecks. The connection speed, processing power, and other limitations may result in slow data processing or other related issues.
Based on the findings, we can then craft a modernization requirement itinerary. It is important to note, though, that the plan for the modernized architecture must adopt a technical and business-based approach. This means that the new architecture to be created must meet the technical demands that operations present as well as the overall business environment requirements.
The most important improvements it must offer are functional upgrades. This means that the new system must improve elements such as:
The new architecture must also meet non-functional requirements, with a particular focus on scalability, maintainability, and security. Legacy systems are often prone to cyber threats, but newly developed architectures are also a hallmark for becoming direct targets by potential attackers.
A microservices-enabled architecture via Spring Boot can help decentralized services. Kubernetes may be used for container orchestration, while Docker may be adopted for containerization. For secure communications, Kafka presents a viable alternative due to its event-driven communications and scalability capabilities.
Several key principles make up a scalable architecture. Developers must keep in mind these principles during modernization.
One of the most important aspects of a scalable architecture is its ability to handle bigger loads without impacting performance. Essentially, there are two types of scalabilities expected from a modernized architecture;
For scalability, load balancing, statelessness, and asynchronous processing is also equally important. This involves distributing requests, stateless components to be able to handle any request, and decoupling components via message queues, respectively.
There are several modern architectural patterns that developers may adopt, such as:
Spring Boot and Spring Cloud, Docker, Kubernetes, Apache Kafka, and AWS Lambda are some of the more modern technologies that developers can use to implement a modernized architecture. However, the choice of technology will ultimately depend on the architecture being integrated, budgetary constraints, and the final expected outcome.
The strategy to be used for architectural redesign also requires careful consideration. The whole idea of the architecture being scalable means that the end result must be efficient and maintainable, even under increased load.
Developers may also use a service-oriented migration model. This migration model is best suited for an architecture that will adopt microservices moving forward. Furthermore, the domain-driven design (DDD) is also a great option for modernization. Here, the legacy system will be broken down into smaller chunks or "contexts." Developers can then create their own microservices with any other technology for each of the contexts individually.
Once migrated, developers will need to focus on performance tuning and optimization. One of the most important aspects of the scalability of the platform is load balancing, which can be accomplished by distributing requests evenly across multiple services. This isn't limited to individual requests, though. Even larger requests can be decoupled and distributed, allowing for asynchronous processing.
Finally, implementing auto-scaling via adaptive AI or Kubernetes can help adjust the number of running instances. For improved processes, developers can also adjust the garbage collection (GC) settings to improve overall memory management. This, in turn, helps minimize pauses during processes and can, therefore, allow for more reliable scalability.
Implementing these best practices can help achieve several benefits, such as:
It's widely recognized that replacing the old with the new brings numerous advantages in various contexts.
Scalable architecture, in general, has proven to be a lifeline for organizations looking to reduce operating costs and improve performance. Decoupling services, asynchronous processing, and horizontal scaling alone can be enough to help manage surges in traffic or workload. Microservices, for example, can help improve virtually any functionality, reallocating resources as and when needed. This flexibility offered by scalable architecture can be critical for all organizations, especially when it comes to healthcare, finance, and e-commerce.