EDDIE PELLS

Associated Press

The committee that chose the 12 contenders for college football's national title was only worried about one thing -- ranking the teams.

Where those teams landed in the College Football Playoff bracket was based on a formula created by conference commissioners. That jumbled up the pairings -- there are some big gaps, for instance, between where a team is seeded and where it's ranked -- and made a strong case for tinkering in the future.

"I think the process to rank the best 25 teams is a great process," said selection committee chairman Warde Manuel. "I've heard debates and discussions about how the seeding of the tournament should go. I will leave that up to the commissioners."

Among the choices the commissioners made months ago that set the template for the bracket released Sunday:

■ Favoring conference champions by giving four of them byes and one more an automatic spot in the field, no matter where they were ranked in the CFP's top 25.

People are also reading... Man arrested on manslaughter, DUI allegations after fatal Napa County crash Update: Tsunami warnings canceled in California after North Coast earthquake Two former Red Hen restaurant sites slated for Napa hotels 41 townhomes proposed in western St. Helena Dogs reportedly abandoned near Calistoga, taken to Napa shelter Former American Canyon track coach pleads guilty to sexually abusing two students The notices are up: residents camping at Napa's Kennedy Park need to move by Monday Napa's Justin-Siena High School celebrates new Zeller Center for Student Engagement Nena Talcott Self-storage facility to join Costco in south Napa neighborhood Napa City Council supports parking code changes to address car camping, oversized vehicles Napa city annexation decision delayed after questions about environmental impact Napa County backs Benjamin Ranch winery settlement Northern California 5-A Football Championship: American Canyon earns state title shot with 43-20 rout of Lassen Two pedestrians seriously injured in Napa collision

■ Not reseeding the bracket after the first round, a move that could have given the best teams more favorable early matchups.

■ Making no attempt to avoid regular-season rematches early in the playoffs.

There was also the issue of the 12-team bracket, which could very well be expanded in the next year or two.

All those choices led to a field full of possibilities, but also one containing head-scratching matchups. The choices could, in some eyes, undermine the College Football Playoff's main mission, which is ( making more money while) providing more "access" -- in other words, a fair shake to more than four deserving teams.

For instance, top-seeded and undefeated Oregon could play its first game against Big Ten foe Ohio State, which was ranked No. 2 for much of the season and lost to the Ducks by a point earlier this year.

And Boise State, from the non-power Mountain West Conference, is the third seed, even though the committee ranked the Broncos ninth.

Here is how things might have looked if certain rules that could come into play in the future were already in place:

Conference champions

First things first -- there's not a single tweak that would've placed Oregon at anything other than the No. 1 seed. The Ducks are the only undefeated team in major college football and winning a title this year would leave them a jaw-dropping 16-0. Had the rules called for simply slotting in the top 12 teams, though, Alabama would be in the bracket and Oregon's path would be wildly different. A look at the coulda-been matchups:

-- No. 12 Arizona State at No. 5 Notre Dame: Big 12 champs would've made it because they rose three spots after that big win over Iowa State.

-- No. 11 Alabama at No. 6 Ohio State: Without automatic berths for conference champions, Tide would have been in, not at the ReliaQuest Bowl against a 7-5 Michigan team.

-- No. 10 SMU at No. 7 Tennessee: Mustangs could've slept soundly despite that heartbreaking loss to Clemson. And the Vols would have had a home game instead of a trip to Ohio State.

-- No. 9 Boise State at No. 8 Indiana: Hoosiers would've gotten the home game their coach thought they deserved, with the winner facing the Ducks.

The third and fourth byes would have gone to Texas and Penn State, both losers in their conference title games -- a turn that would have furthered questions as to whether those games have outlived their usefulness.

Reseeding, rematches

As things stand, Oregon will face either Ohio State or Tennessee at the Rose Bowl in the quarterfinals. Reseeding or avoiding regular-season matchups in the early rounds would likely have given the Ducks an easier game to start.

Under a reseeding scenario, the Ohio State matchup could only happen if every home team -- Texas, Penn State, Notre Dame and the Buckeyes -- were to win its first-round game.

This tweak also would prevent this year's possibility of Clemson vs. Arizona State in the quarterfinals -- two teams that weren't in the top 12 a week ago. Or the prospect of two bye teams -- ASU and Boise State -- being big underdogs against teams, think Texas or Penn State, that have to win a game to play them.

More teams

This one is a loaded question, because when the playoffs expand they will do so with different rules.

One formula kicking around involves giving three automatic spots to the Big Ten and SEC, two to the ACC and Big 12, one to the best-ranked champion of a Group of Five conference and three at-large spots.

This, too, would cause problems and shuffling and teams getting passed over. But where it really breaks down is that 18thranked Iowa State of the Big 12 would land in this bracket as the 14 seed despite losing to Arizona State by 26.

Hard to see that going over well at Miami, or Ole Miss, or Colorado.

Then again, nobody ever said this was going to be fair.

Be the first to know

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Sign up! * I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.