Most of the money went to wind farms switched off because the national grid could not handle all the power generated in Scotland.
Critics say consumers are footing the bill for a system that cannot keep up with the nation's renewable energy revolution.
Households in the UK are footing a £6.6 billion bill that has been paid over the past seven years to energy firms -- mainly wind farms -- for not generating electricity.
Read More:
Revealed: Households foot 'absurd' £6.6bn bill to switch off green energy
Enough is enough: 50 Scots councils seek ministers summit on green energy 'wild west'
Forbes under fire for Scots energy project crisis summit absence
Revealed: 13,000 Scots oil and gas jobs disappear in a year - as UK relies on imports
Coalition to push for ministers answers over Scots energy projects pause call
These payments, known as constraint payments, happen when the national grid cannot handle all the electricity being produced safely. In other words, turbines are being switched off while consumers pay for the electricity that is not used.
The UK's electricity grid has limits on how much power it can carry at any one time. When too much electricity is produced -- for example, when wind farms in Scotland are generating heavily -- the grid risks being overloaded. To prevent damage, the UK Government -owned NESO (National Energy System Operator) must intervene. Because electricity cannot be easily stored, energy firms are compensated for reducing output so the grid stays safe.
Think of the electricity grid like a motorway system. When too many cars try to use it at once, traffic jams occur. To prevent accidents, some cars are stopped or rerouted.
Green energy bosses have highlighted the contribution onshore wind farms make to Scotland's economy
Similarly, when too much electricity is flowing, some turbines must be switched off to prevent "traffic jams" in the grid, and energy companies are paid for this downtime.
It has skyrocketed in recent years. In 2024/25 alone, constraint payments reached a record £1.7 billion, more than four times the figure in 2019/20, and nearly £700 million higher than the previous year. Of that, £1.2 billion (70%) went to Scottish wind farms.
Government data indicates that Scotland produced about a third of the UK onshore wind power generation last year. The country's geography is considered ideal for wind energy, but the grid's capacity to carry that power south is limited. So when turbines produce more electricity than the system can handle, Scotland is where most curtailments happen, meaning most payments go to Scottish generators.
Technically, it is a national grid issue, but it has major financial and political consequences. Consumers ultimately pay these costs through their energy bills. At a time when many households face skyrocketing bills -- including a 55% increase over the past four years -- these payments are seen by some as absurd. Critics argue that the government and grid operators are failing to invest in solutions, leaving consumers to bear the financial burden.
Campaigners and experts suggest increasing energy storage. Large-scale batteries could store excess electricity when the wind is strong and release it when demand is higher, reducing the need to switch off turbines.
There are also calls for grid reinforcement ensuring that transmission lines between Scotland and England to allow more electricity to flow south safely.
And some argue for expanding nuclear or other steady power sources to balance intermittent renewables.
Electricity is tricky because it must be used as it is generated. Unlike water or oil, it cannot be stockpiled easily in large amounts. Batteries help, but current capacity is limited. As of 2025, Scotland operates only about 1 GW of battery storage, though plans exist to increase this. Until that capacity comes online, curtailments and payments are unavoidable when production peaks.
Some critics compare the situation to North Sea oil in the 1970s and 1980s. Back then, Scotland produced a huge share of the UK's oil, yet there were concerns that most of the economic benefit went south, leaving local communities frustrated.
Oil and gas. (Image: PA)
Similarly, with wind energy, Scotland generates the bulk of renewable electricity but the concern is that nation will see relatively little economic benefit, prompting fears of a repeat exploitation scenario.
No, but they are seen as by far the largest contributor. Constraint payments can also be triggered by other generation types, like gas or nuclear, but because wind is intermittent and concentrated in Scotland, it accounts for the majority of curtailment costs.
What role does NESO play?
The UK Government owned public company NESO manages Britain's electricity supply to ensure it is safe, reliable, and increasingly green. When the grid is at risk of overload, NESO decides which generators to curtail and pays them accordingly. While these interventions are necessary for safety, the high cost has sparked anger among consumers and politicians.
Several factors are thought to have contributed and include maintenance or upgrades temporarily reduce the capacity of key energy transmission motorway, while during windy periods, turbines are generating more electricity than the system can take.
Also as Scotland's wind capacity is growing, so curtailment payments are occurring more frequently.
Consumers are directly paying for these payments through their bills. With energy costs already high, the £6.6bn cumulative cost over seven years adds a significant burden.
It also feeds frustration in some quarters with the government and energy companies for failing to fix the underlying grid problems.
No, but Scotland is disproportionately affected because of its high concentration of wind farms and geographic position.
Clyde wind farm (Image: .)
The rest of the UK benefits from the electricity generated, while Scotland bears the brunt of curtailment costs and system management challenges.
NESO and the government are planning to build more energy storage capacity in Scotland and across the UK and is trying to strengthen the transmission network to carry electricity more efficiently.
Yes. Scotland is seen by government as having enormous renewable potential and could lead the UK in clean energy, but only if the infrastructure is upgraded and investment in storage and transmission keeps pace.